March 22, 2010
Dear Families, We need you! On Wednesday, March 24th the House Education Committee will be voting on several bills. Two of these bills would directly and adversely affect cyber charter schools.
- HB 483 - This bill would not permit a child to enroll in a cyber charter school if the child does not meet the age requirements of the home district. Parents who choose a program for improving the early education of their child should not be denied this option.
- HB 2320 - This bill would force cyber charter schools to deal with truancy issues. It will end up forcing cyber charter schools to hire additional staff and incur significant expenses for the reporting requirements and attendance hearings all across the state. Cyber charter schools enroll students from all of the 501 districts. This would cause a huge financial burden on our schools. The end result is that cyber charter schools are unlikely to enroll truant students leaving them with the school district or causing an older student to dropout of school. Neither of these options is desirable for students or their families!
Together these bills begin the effort to kill cyber charter schools!
Please contact your legislator and also the members of the House Education Committee. Call them and let them know you oppose these bills and want to protect public cyber education! Below is a list of members of the House Education Committee and their contact information. We must remain vigilant against attacks on our schools!
We need to show just how strongly we support our public cyber schools, and just how wrong it would be to consider anti-cyber school legislation. Our message needs to be loud and clear, that our public cyber schools must be protected!
If you do not know who your legislator is, you can go to our website www.pacyberfamilies.org and click on useful links. Click on “Find Your Legislator”. On the next page enter your zip code in the upper right corner. It will bring up a listing of your representative.
Our friends at PCCS have also written a letter to the House Education Committee to oppose these bills. I have included their letter to the committee below. I hope you will take a moment to read it.
Day on the Hill
Speaking of remaining vigilant, let’s all come together on May 25, 2010 for our 4th Annual Day on the Hill to show our state legislators just how serious we are about protecting schools that have done so much for our children.
We are going to be making a few changes to the event this year. We will not be meeting at the Capitol this year. This year we will be meeting in the Mall area near the State Museum on North Street. We will then be marching together from North Street down Commonwealth Avenue where we will then gather at the Capitol Fountain for the rally.
We hope we will see all of you there! By doing this, we are going to let the Legislature know that we’re watching – and WE ARE COMING!
Keep moving forward! Cindy Strausburger President
Here is a list of House Education Committee Members:
Majority members: Capitol Number District Number
Rep. James Roebuck 717-783-1665 215-724-2227 Rep. Ken Smith 717-780-4757 570-372-2845 Rep. Richard Grucela 717-705-1878 610-614-1312 Rep. Barbara McIvaine-Smith 717-705-1922 610-696-4990 Rep. John Yudichak 717-787-1751 570-740-7031 Rep. Mike Carroll 717-787-3589 570-655-4883 Rep. H. Scott Conklin 717-780-4764 814-238-5477 Rep. Lawrence Curry 717-783-1079 215-572-5210 Rep. Patrick Harkins 717-787-7406 814-459-1949 Rep. Mark Longietti 717-772-4035 724-981-4655 Rep. Michael O’Brien 717-783-8098 215-503-7850 Rep. John Pallone 717-783-1819 724-339-1990 Rep. Chelsa Wagner 717-783-1582 412-343-2094 Rep. Jake Wheatley 717-783-3783 412-471-7760 Rep. Rosita Youngblood 717-787-7727 215-849-6426 Minority Members: Rep. Paul Clymer 717-783-3154 215-257-0279 Rep. Will Tallman 717-783-8875 717-633-1721 Rep. Bernie O’Neill 717-705-7170 215-441-2627 Rep. Thomas Quigley 717-772-9963 610-718-5787 Rep. Kathy Rapp 717-787-1367 814-728-3564 Rep. Bryan Cutler 717-783-6424 717-786-4551 Rep. Mike Fleck 717-787-3335 814-644-2996 Rep. Duane Milne 717-787-8579 610-251-1070 Rep. Thomas Murt 717-787-6885 215-674-3021 Rep. Mike Reese 717-783-9311 724-423-2812 Rep. Todd Rock 717-783-5218 717-749-7384 Letter from PCCS to the House Education Committee:
March 22, 2010
Honorable James Roebuck Honorable Paul Clymer
Chairman, House Education Committee Republican Chairman, House Education Committee
Harrisburg, PA 17101 Harrisburg, PA 17101
Via fax
RE: HB 483(PN535); HB 2320 (PN 3345); HB 2328 (PN 3353)
Dear Chairmen Roebuck and Clymer:
On behalf of the members of the Pennsylvania Coalition of Charter Schools, representing nearly 110 charter schools—both “Cyber” Charter Schools and “Bricks and Mortar” schools—who educate students from every school district in the Commonwealth, I write in strong opposition to each of these bills listed above.
Each one of these bills will harm charter schools in Pennsylvania. Collectively, if enacted, these bills would create serious hardships to Charter Schools and, in some cases, imperil the very existence of some Charter Schools.
Before briefly addressing each bill, I must note that these bills are being offered neither to fix an alleged problem with Charter Schools, nor are they being offered to help our schools or our students. Rather, each bill, in enacted, would either deprive a school, or student, of a service; or place an undue burden on a Charter School. This is misguided and regrettable.
HB 483 (PN 535): This bill would harm our schools by forcing them to reduce the services that they offer to students. Charter Schools were created, among other reasons, to help create education alternatives and to allow academic programs to be created to fill needs that are missing in traditional public schools. This bill goes against the very essence of charter schools and creates a dangerous precedent.
If today you legislate that charters may not educate Pre-K students, unless the local school district also offers that service, perhaps tomorrow you will decide that charters may not offer Spanish or AP Chemistry or Remedial Mathematics, if the local district doesn’t offer the same courses.
Finally, this legislation is in direct contrast to Governor Rendell’s Pre-K Counts initiative. This bill goes against current law and future goals.
HB 2320 (PN3345): While this bill may have an admirable goal—i.e., keeping kids in school—its approach is unduly burdensome to Charter Schools.
This legislation would require that a student’s attendance (truancy) record ought to travel with him from a traditional public school to Cyber Charter School. Fair enough. The problem is that this bill places the burden of collecting records on the Cyber Charter. Worse yet, this bill places the cost and administration of prosecution on the Cyber Charter—in the student’s home district.
In other words--for purposes of this example, a Cyber Charter student living in the Erie School District and now attending a Cyber Charter based in Philadelphia might be one day away from being legally “truant. If he misses that next day, the Philadelphia-based Cyber Charter School not only would have to know that he is now “truant,” but also, bring the student before a District Magistrate in Erie. This is an unfunded, unwise mandate.
HB 2328 (PN 3353): This bill will achieve no goal other than depriving bona fide choices to parents, when selecting a Charter School. By depriving transportation to students seeking to attend a Charter School, many Charter Schools will no longer be a realistic option for parents.
Again, the objectives—when creating Charter Schools—were to offer parents meaningful choices, encourage competition and to allow Charter Schools to meet the needs of students who were not having their needs met in traditional public schools.
Depriving Charter Schools of transportation and depriving Charter Schools of transportation-funding is unfair and unwise. Before considering this bill, I urge the committee to amend it to include direct funding to charter schools for transportation when districts choose not to offer their own transportation. Allowing districts to keep transportation money and not offer it is unfair both to the taxpayers and to the families who choose to send their children to a charter school.
Respectfully, these bills will each harm Charter Schools; and, not one of them will improve education in one school, nor for one child. Collectively, these bills take away services and choices from our students and their families; and, place undue burdens on Charter Schools. Therefore, we request a “No” vote on each bill.
Sincerely,
Lawrence F. Jones, Jr.
President, PCCS
|